The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine structural abnormalities in subregions of the prefrontal cortex in elderly patients with depression, the authors explored differences in gray matter, white matter, and CSF volumes by applying a parcellation method based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHOD: Twenty-four elderly patients with major depression and 19 group-matched comparison subjects were studied with high-resolution MRI. Cortical surface extraction, tissue segmentation, and cortical parcellation methods were applied to obtain volume measures of gray matter, white matter, and CSF in seven prefrontal subregions: the anterior cingulate, gyrus rectus, orbitofrontal cortex, precentral gyrus, superior frontal cortex, middle frontal cortex, and inferior frontal cortex. RESULTS: Highly significant bilateral volume reductions in gray matter were observed in the anterior cingulate, the gyrus rectus, and the orbitofrontal cortex. Depressed patients also exhibited significant bilateral white matter volume reductions and significant CSF volume increases in the anterior cingulate and the gyrus rectus. Finally, the depressed group showed significant CSF volume reductions in the orbitofrontal cortex relative to the comparison subjects. None of the other regions examined revealed significant structural abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: The prominent bilateral gray matter deficits in the anterior cingulate and the gyrus rectus as well as the orbitofrontal cortex may reflect disease-specific modifications of elderly depression. The differential pattern of abnormalities detected in the white matter and CSF compartments imply that distinct etiopathological mechanisms might underlie the structural cortical changes in these regions.

Major depression is conceptualized as a disorder that involves abnormalities of frontolimbic brain regions (1, 2). Efforts to unravel the precise structural and functional impairments underlying major depression have employed neuroimaging and neuropathological procedures. To date, functional imaging studies in adult patients have primarily focused on the prefrontal cortex, showing dysfunction in the dorsolateral prefrontal (38), anterior cingulate (913), and orbitofrontal cortex (1315). In geriatric depression, functional imaging studies have also reported decreased blood flow in the orbitofrontal cortex (16) and anterior cingulate (17, 18) as well as biochemical abnormalities in frontal white matter (19). Furthermore, diffusion tensor imaging has shown that microstructural white matter abnormalities in close proximity to the anterior cingulate are associated with lower likelihood of remission in elderly patients with depression (20).

A critical role of the prefrontal cortex in major depressive disorder is further suggested by a number of postmortem anatomical investigations that have revealed decreases in the density or number of glia and the density and size of some neurons in the orbitofrontal cortex and anterior cingulate (21). In addition, one neuropathological study in elderly subjects has described a marked specificity for deep white matter hyperintensities at the level of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, consistent with the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) literature that has suggested high-intensity lesions as one of the primary neurobiological substrates of elderly depression (22). Applying MRI estimates of brain and high-intensity lesion volumes together with clinical indices of cerebrovascular and nonvascular comorbidity, we have proposed that two distinct paths might lead to major depression in the elderly (23). One path might be represented by high-intensity lesions stemming from vascular and nonvascular medical comorbidity. Smaller frontal volumes might reflect another path in which a complex series of interconnected neurobiological events, perhaps influenced by genetic and environmental factors, might provide the changes mediating frontal volume deficits and, ultimately, major depression.

Despite the growing evidence for an involvement of the prefrontal cortex in younger as well as elderly depressed patients, there have been relatively few MRI volumetric studies examining the prefrontal cortex. Two previous structural MRI studies conducted by our group have demonstrated a reduction in whole prefrontal cortical volume in late-onset depression (24, 25). However, the human prefrontal cortex is a large and highly differentiated brain region in which different subregions are associated with specific behavioral and cognitive functions (26). Hence, it is conceivable to argue that specific subregions within the prefrontal cortex might be distinctively involved in the regulation and modulation of affect and emotions deficient in depression.

Two prior MRI studies have reported a left lateralized volume decrease of the subgenual cingulate cortex in patients with a family history of major depression (9, 27), although a more recent investigation could not replicate these findings in familial major depressive disorder (28). A further study in adult depressed patients found a reduction in medial orbitofrontal (gyrus rectus) volume, with no differences in size in the anterior cingulate (29). Possible explanations for the variability in findings may include methodological differences in image acquisition (i.e., slice thickness), region of interest delineation, and patient populations.

To date, two volumetric MRI studies with a focus on a specific region within the prefrontal cortex have been published in geriatric depression. These studies revealed a bilateral decrease in orbitofrontal gray matter (30) and a significant association between smaller orbitofrontal volumes and functional impairment (31).

Volumetric image analysis methods allow assessment of abnormalities in gray matter, white matter, and CSF volumes independently. The investigation of these tissue volumes in frontal subregions might therefore provide additional perspectives toward understanding the pathophysiology of distinct regional abnormalities in major depression.

To this aim, the present study examined differences in gray matter, white matter, and CSF in specific frontal subregions of elderly, depressed, medication-free patients who were compared with healthy volunteers group-matched for age and gender. Applying a locally developed MRI-based parcellation method of the prefrontal cortex, we subdivided the prefrontal cortex into the following seven functionally relevant subregions: the anterior cingulate, gyrus rectus, orbitofrontal cortex, precentral gyrus, superior frontal cortex, middle frontal cortex, and inferior frontal cortex.

In light of the existing literature (3033), we predicted that compared with healthy subjects, elderly depressed patients would exhibit gray matter abnormalities in the orbitofrontal cortex. We also hypothesized that we would observe gray matter abnormalities in ventromedial areas on the basis of previous volumetric MRI (9, 34) and postmortem studies (35) in younger patients that have suggested a crucial role of the cingulate cortex in major depression. No published studies to our knowledge have investigated regional white matter and CSF changes in elderly patients with depression. Nonetheless, we predicted that changes in white matter or CSF would occur in the presence of gray matter reductions after we corrected for intracranial volume.

Method

Subjects

Subjects were 24 elderly patients with major depression (18 women and six men; mean age=65.85 years [SD=8.18]) and 19 nondepressed comparison subjects (15 women and four men; mean age=66.24 years [SD=7.25]). All depressed patients met DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder and were assessed with a structured psychiatric interview. All patients had scores of 15 or greater on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (36). Depressed patients had an average of two prior episodes of depression (SD=3), with mean age at onset of depression of 35 years (SD=3.45). The purpose of these inclusion criteria was to focus on elderly patients with at least one episode before age 60, in addition to the index episode. Information on prior episodes and the age at onset was obtained from patients and caregivers.

All patients had been free of psychotropic medications for at least 2 weeks before imaging. None of the patients had histories of long-term antidepressant treatment. Patients received comprehensive medical and neurologic examinations and laboratory testing. None of the subjects had clinical evidence of dementia, suspected dementia, or any other brain disorder according to a review of the subjects’ history and a mental status examination. Patients were excluded if they had a history of bipolar disorder, alcohol abuse, or dependence. Mean Mini-Mental Status Examination scores (37) were in the normal range in the major depression group (mean=28.45, SD=1.45) as well as in the comparison group (mean=29.53, SD=0.80).

Patients were recruited through local newspapers and radio advertisements and through referrals from the geriatric psychiatry ambulatory care programs at the UCLA Medical Center. Comparison subjects were recruited from the community through newspapers and radio advertisements. All comparison subjects underwent a psychiatric examination and a structured interview (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV) for healthy subjects to rule out current or past psychopathology. The study was performed in accordance with UCLA’s policies of the Human Subject Protection Committees, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects after the procedures had been fully explained.

Imaging Protocol

All subjects were studied with MRI performed on a 1.5-T Signa magnet (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee) that used a coronal T1-weighted spoiled gradient/recall acquisition in the steady state with the following parameters: repetition time=20 msec; echo time=6 msec; flip angle=45°; 1.4-mm slice thickness without gaps; field of view=22 cm; number of excitations=1.5; matrix size=256×192 mm; in-plane resolution=0.859375×0.859375.

Image Analysis

All image data sets were processed with a series of steps in preparation for manual delineation of prefrontal subregions.

First, images were subjected to brain masking with removal of nonbrain tissue (i.e., scalp and orbits) and cerebellum. Brain volumes were corrected for signal intensity inhomogeneities (38), aligned, and placed into stereotaxic coordinates, without scaling. This procedure was used to correct for differences in head position and to place data in a common space that was specifically used for group comparisons.

Fully automated tissue segmentation was then applied to the brain volumes, where voxels were automatically classified as most representative of gray matter, white matter, or CSF (39) (Figure 1). Quantification of white matter lesions was not assessed in this study.

The fully automated protocol has been shown valid in comparison with semiautomated tissue segmentation procedures used in our previous reports (40, 41). We assessed 24 subjects with our earlier manual segmentation protocol (40) that used the completely automated classification scheme of Shattuck and colleagues (39) and found Pearson’s correlations of 0.96 for white matter volume, 0.94 for gray matter volume, and 0.80 for CSF volume.

Finally, a high-resolution shape representation of the cortex was extracted for each subject by using automated software (42). By using a three-dimensional active surface algorithm, a spherical mesh surface was created that was continuously transformed to fit a cortical surface tissue threshold intensity value (signal value that best differentiates cortical CSF on the outer surface of the brain from the underlying cortical gray matter) from individual brain volumes. These surface/shape extractions were used to aid in delineation of frontal cortical substructures.

Total intracranial volume including sulcal and subarachnoid CSF but not cerebellum was calculated.

Anatomical Boundaries

The rules applied to achieve parcellation of the prefontal lobe into seven subregions for each hemisphere are listed in Appendix 1. Complete details of the written anatomical protocols can be found on the World Wide Web (http://www.loni.ucla.edu/protocols/ Prefrontal_cortex.html). All anatomical delineations were reconciled using each individual’s three-dimensional surface model (Figure 2) and all three planes to corroborate sulcal and subregion identity (Figure 3). Delineations were also verified by using two neuroanatomical atlases (43, 44). For interrater reliability, all anatomical regions were delineated on 10 randomly chosen image data sets. Intraclass correlation coefficients for the reliability of gray matter, white matter, and CSF volumes, as well as total volumes in all subregions ranged between 0.85 and 0.92.

Statistical Analysis

Gray matter, white matter, CSF, and total region volume in each of the seven prefrontal subregions for each hemisphere were dependent measures in analyses of covariance with diagnosis as a between-group factor. To address potential interindividual differences in brain size that may be associated with demographic variables (i.e., gender and age), region of interest volumes as a proportion of the subject’s total intracranial volume (45) were used as dependent variables. Although gender distribution of the two groups was similar, gender was included as a covariate, since earlier investigations (46) have reported differences between male and female subjects in some of the regions measured in the present study. Age did not significantly differ between the groups but was also used as a covariate.

Although multiple tests were performed, we elected to not apply a correction procedure, such as the Bonferroni. Applying a Bonferroni correction would have protected our results from type I error, but this approach would have made the results highly prone to type II errors, given that a large number of comparisons were done. The significance level adopted was alpha=0.05 (two-tailed).

Results

The results are presented in Table 1 and in Figure 4. Group effects are described after correction for total intracranial volume, with age and gender as covariates. Table 1 also documents raw volumes before correction for intracranial volume. Depressed patients exhibited highly significant gray matter volume reductions in the left and right anterior cingulate (differences of 18% and 20%, respectively), the left and right gyrus rectus (differences of 19% and 24%), and the left and right orbitofrontal cortex (differences of 12% in both).

In the anterior cingulate, significant bilateral white matter volume reductions (left: 14% difference; right: 21% difference) and CSF volume increases (left: 18% difference; right: 24% difference) were observed in the depressed patients. In the gyrus rectus, elderly patients with major depression showed significant bilateral white matter volume reductions (left: 15% difference; right: 18% difference) and CSF volume increases (left: 22% difference; right: 25% difference). Significant CSF volume decreases were seen in the left and right orbitofrontal cortex (differences of 21% and 20%, respectively), with no significant difference in white matter volume.

White matter and CSF volume abnormalities were not as pronounced as the gray matter volume reductions. Total anterior cingulate, gyrus rectus, and orbitofrontal volumes were significantly smaller in patients relative to comparison subjects. We did not detect evidence for gender or age effects in any of the volumes analyzed.

There were no significant differences between the depressed patients and the comparison group in gray matter, white matter, and CSF volumes of the precentral gyrus, superior frontal cortex, middle frontal cortex, and inferior frontal cortex. There were also no significant differences between patients and comparison subjects in total brain volume (t=0.68, df=39, p=0.50), total gray matter volume (t=0.71, df=39, p=0.50), total white matter volume (t=0.23, df=39, p=0.80), or total CSF (t=0.83, df=39, p=0.40).

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to use a volumetric MRI-based parcellation method of the prefrontal cortex to examine structural abnormalities in major depression. The main findings of this study were 1) a pronounced reduction in left and right gray matter volumes in the anterior cingulate, the gyrus rectus, and the orbitofrontal cortex; 2) significant bilateral decreases in white matter volume and significant increases in CSF volume in the anterior cingulate and the gyrus rectus; 3) a significant bilateral reduction in CSF volume in the orbitofrontal cortex of depressed patients relative to comparison subjects. In sum, the present study shows that volumetric abnormalities occur in distinct tissue compartments of specific frontal subregions in elderly patients with depression.

On the basis of the structural imaging literature to date, the orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate, and gyrus rectus have been previously identified as critical regions involved in major depression (9, 29, 31, 34, 47), but this is the first time that cingulate volume abnormalities are reported in elderly depressed patients.

The present findings support the results of a prior report that found reduced gray matter volumes in the orbitofrontal cortex of elderly patients with major depression (50). The present findings also contribute to the suggestive evidence that dysfunction of the orbitofrontal cortex may yield a characteristic state of depressed mood in which the ability to interrupt perseverative melancholic thoughts and anxious responses to ordinarily nonthreatening stimuli seems impaired (48).

It is of interest that our results show a reduction of CSF volumes in the depressed patients relative to the comparison subjects in the orbitofrontal cortex. The mechanism of this CSF volume decrease is unclear. However, decreased CSF volumes may suggest that orbitofrontal cortical volume reduction is indicative of hypodevelopment rather than atrophy even in elderly depressed patients. Thus, it may be hypothesized that the individuals studied here were born with smaller volumes of the orbitofrontal cortex and, perhaps, with specific neuroanatomical changes in this region that over time led to exaggerated stress responses and aversive thought and emotion. Longitudinal studies, perhaps among those at risk for developing depression, may help clarify whether the abnormalities are static during the course of the illness (and more likely to be neurodevelopmental) or progressive (and more likely to be neurodegenerative) in nature.

In this context, it is also interesting to discuss our findings in the anterior cingulate and the gyrus rectus. In contrast to previous reports in younger patients (9, 34), our results reveal bilateral abnormalities in these regions.

The present study reveals bilateral volume decreases of gray and white matter, along with significant bilateral CSF volume increases, in the anterior cingulate and the gyrus rectus. This pattern of findings might suggest that distinct neuroanatomical changes are occurring in these regions relative to the findings in the orbitofrontal cortex. Perhaps the increase in CSF is reflective of neurodegenerative processes rather than a neurodevelopmental abnormality in depressed patients with a later age at onset. Of note, glial pathology could play a primary role, given that reduced density and number of glia in the anterior cingulate have been reported in a neuropathological study of mood disorder (49). It is possible, therefore, that the overall cortical changes observed in this region might point to a loss of fiber pathways that connect different brain regions participating in mood regulation. Indeed, the anterior cingulate is a critical area of integration between brain regions that have been implicated in the cognitive/affective and somatic/vegetative symptoms of depression. More specifically, the anterior cingulate is the origin of the anterior cingulate frontal-subcortical circuit (2). It is interesting that this circuit receives major afferents from the hippocampus (2), which communicates with higher-order association cortical regions through the entorhinal, perirhinal, and parahippocampal cortices (50, 51). In addition, the anterior cingulate is interconnected with the amygdala through efferents to the lateral nucleus and through afferents from the basal nucleus, which also project to many higher-order areas (52). The cingulate gyrus is reciprocally connected with the orbitofrontal cortex (48). Stress and clinical depression are often associated with hypercortisolemia, which has neurotoxic properties (53). It has been suggested that stress-induced reductions in neurotrophins may also play a role in the structural changes observed in patients with major depression (54). Thus, if hypodevelopmental phenomena underlie the abnormalities in the orbitofrontal cortex, it could be speculated that a complex set of interrelated neurobiological events, perhaps mediated through these early structural changes, may constitute the path that leads to progressive cingulate damage over time.

Bilateral anterior cingulate abnormalities in elderly patients with depression may be supported by two previous functional neuroimaging studies: one study found a significant bilateral blood flow reduction in the anterior cingulate cortex in elderly depressed patients that persisted after electroconvulsive therapy (17); de Asis and colleagues (18) reported bilateral activation deficits in the anterior cingulate in a study that used brain activation paradigms. Of interest is that abnormalities of the anterior cingulate are thought to be associated with executive and psychomotor symptoms (55), often prominent in geriatric depression (18). On the other hand, a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study conducted by our group did not find any changes in myo-inositol/creatine, choline/creatine, and N-acetylaspartate/creatine ratios in the anterior cingulate of elderly patients with major depression (19). Since the present investigation included some of the patients of the latter study (19), the current findings may suggest that structural abnormalities and specific biochemical events might occur independent of one another.

It is noteworthy that the gyrus rectus shows structural abnormalities similar to those observed in the anterior cingulate, and it is important that the gyrus rectus is considered to be an extension of the anterior cingulate onto the frontal lobe (56). This may help explain the similarity of the structural changes in both regions. It could also complement and strengthen our results, which propose bilateral anterior cingulate abnormalities as critical neurobiological features in elderly patients with depression. Bremner and colleagues (29) found decreased gray matter volumes of the gyrus rectus in adult depressed patients without any structural changes in the anterior cingulate. To our knowledge, in the two volumetric MRI studies of elderly depressed patients with a focus on a specific region within the prefrontal cortex, the orbitofrontal cortex and gyrus rectus were combined into one single region of interest (30, 31). However, the gyrus rectus might merit further investigation in major depression. Indeed, it may be of interest to note that functional imaging studies in schizophrenia have shown a clear distinction between the gyrus rectus and the orbitofrontal cortex during several cognitive tasks, suggesting that the gyrus rectus may be part of a circuit that mediates some specific emotional functions in humans (57).

It might be argued that accelerated aging or increased vulnerability to the general effects of age could have contributed to the structural abnormalities detected in our study. Actually, there is controversy about which subregions of the prefrontal cortex are particularly affected by the aging process. Age effects reported in the anterior cingulate have been dependent on the method applied (58). A selective preservation of the orbitofrontal cortex has been found in very old healthy elderly subjects (59), while other investigations detected an age-associated volumetric reduction in this region (58, 60). Although the application of different methods has been proposed as a possible explanation for these discrepancies, this issue may clearly warrant further investigation, also in view of the fact that previous studies revealed left-lateralized gray matter reduction in the anterior cingulate in younger patients, whereas here we report bilateral abnormalities in an elderly depressed population.

The present findings may be limited by small study group size, although the highly significant results in gray matter volumes are noteworthy for a relatively small sample.

A further limitation of this study concerns the potential for inflated type I error in comparisons of white matter and CSF changes in elderly patients with depression relative to healthy comparison subjects. Therefore, statistically less pronounced differences, such as the bilateral white matter and CSF abnormalities observed here, should be interpreted with caution. However, since this is the first study that explores white matter and CSF volumetric differences in addition to gray matter differences between depressed patients and healthy volunteers, we were willing to tolerate a higher chance of type I error rather than miss a true positive finding. Indeed, our results in the white matter and CSF compartments may provide a valuable complement to previous investigations of gray matter abnormalities in major depression (9, 2931, 34), giving rise to new hypotheses regarding possible etiopathological mechanisms underlying structural cortical abnormalities.

It has been argued that white matter abnormalities should be interpreted with caution, given the lack of clear anatomical landmarks to define white matter subregions within the frontal lobe. In the present study, white matter was generally defined as tissue next to a straight line connecting the deepest point of the sulci that were considered as anatomical landmarks of a given subregion. The high interrater reliability for all segmented volumes may, however, support the notion that white matter measures interpreted in conjunction with gray matter offer a more appropriate and meaningful approach, even given limitations in defining white matter boundaries. Finally, future studies may be needed to specifically investigate the contribution of gender to structural abnormalities in elderly depression.

Conclusions

Highly pronounced robust gray matter deficits were observed in three brain regions, namely the anterior cingulate, the gyrus rectus, and the orbitofrontal cortex, abnormalities consistent with our predictions based on the neuroimaging and neuropathological literature. The extent to which the aforementioned abnormalities might be specifically related to elderly depressed patients remains to be clarified.

Further clinicopathological work, with imaging both in vivo and after death, will be needed to carefully examine radiopathological correlations and to draw further insights into the purported neuroanatomical hallmarks of elderly depression. In addition, future investigations should address the question to what extent age at illness onset, regardless of age, might be relevant to specific neuroanatomical disease markers. This consideration may be of special interest also in light of previous evidence revealing strikingly more severe white matter lesions in subjects with an onset of depression after age 60 years than in individuals who had an onset before age 60 (61).

TABLE 1

Received Jan. 7, 2003; revision received May 13, 2003; accepted May 15, 2003. From the Laboratory of Neuro Imaging, Department of Neurology, UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles; and the Program in Neuroscience, Brescia University School of Medicine, Brescia, Italy. Address reprint requests to Dr. Kumar, Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute & Hospital, C9-938A NPH, 760 Westwood Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90024; (e-mail). Supported by research grants from NIMH to Dr. Toga (MH-65166) and Dr. Kumar (MH-55115, MH-61567, MH-02043) and from the National Center for Research Resources to Dr. Toga (RR-13642 and RR-00865).

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Prefrontal Cortex Image and Its Corresponding Image Segmented Into Gray Matter, White Matter, and CSF

APPENDIX 1.

APPENDIX 1.

Enlarge table
Figure 2.

Figure 2. Three-Dimensional High-Resolution Shape Representations Used to Aid in the Parcellation of Prefrontal Cortex Subregions Measured in 24 Elderly Depressed Patients and 19 Comparison Subjects

Figure 3.

Figure 3. Coronal, Sagittal, and Axial Views of the Anatomical Landmarks for the Prefrontal Cortex Subregions Measured in 24 Elderly Depressed Patients and 19 Comparison Subjectsa

aSubregion identity was defined on the three planes simultaneously.

Figure 4.

Figure 4. Gray Matter Volume Distribution in the Anterior Cingulate, Gyrus Rectus, and Orbitofrontal Cortex of 24 Elderly Depressed Patients and 19 Comparison Subjectsa

aGray matter volumes are presented as proportion measures of the subject’s total intracranial volume. Horizontal bars represent group means.

References

1. Drevets WC: Neuroimaging studies in mood disorders. Biol Psychiatry 2000; 48:813–829Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

2. Tekin S, Cummings JL: Frontal-subcortical neuronal circuits and clinical neuropsychiatry: an update. J Psychosom Res 2002; 53:647–654Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

3. Buchsbaum MS, DeLisi LE, Holcomb H, Cappelletti J, King AC, Johnson J, Hazlett E, Dowling-Zimmerman S, Post RM, Morihisa J: Anterior gradients in cerebral glucose use in schizophrenia and affective disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1984; 41:1159–1166Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

4. Baxter LR, Schwartz JM, Phelps ME, Mazziotta JC, Guze BH, Selin CE, Gerner RH, Sumida RM: Reduction of prefrontal cortex glucose metabolism common to three types of depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989; 46:243–249Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

5. Martinot JL, Hardy P, Feline A, Huret JD, Mazoyer B, Attar-Levy D, Pappata S, Syrota A: Left prefrontal glucose hypometabolism in the depressed state: a confirmation. Am J Psychiatry 1990; 147:1313–1317LinkGoogle Scholar

6. Bench CJ, Friston KJ, Brown RG, Scott LC, Frackowiak RSI, Dolan RJ: The anatomy of melancholia: focal abnormalities of cerebral blood flow in major depression. Psychol Med 1992; 22:607–615Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

7. Biver F, Goldman S, Delvenne V, Luxen A, De Maertelaer V, Hubain P, Mendlewicz J, Lotstra F: Frontal and parietal metabolic disturbances in unipolar depression. Biol Psychiatry 1994; 36:381–388Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

8. Mann JJ, Malone KM, Diehl DJ, Perel J, Cooper TB, Mintun MA: Demonstration in vivo of reduced serotonin responsivity in the brain of untreated depressed patients. Am J Psychiatry 1996; 153:174–182; correction, 153:588LinkGoogle Scholar

9. Drevets WC, Price JL, Simpson JR Jr, Todd RD, Reich T, Vannier M, Raichle ME: Subgenual prefrontal cortex abnormalities in mood disorders. Nature 1997; 386:824–827Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

10. George MS, Ketter TA, Parekh PI, Rosinsky N, Ring HA, Pazzaglia PJ, Marangell LB, Callahan AM, Post RM: Blunted left cingulate activation in mood disorder subjects during a response interference task (the Stroop). J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1997; 9:55–63Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

11. Larisch R, Klimke A, Vosberg H, Loffler S, Gaebel W, Muller-Gartner HW: In vivo evidence for the involvement of dopamine-D2 receptors in striatum and anterior cingulate gyrus in major depression. Neuroimage 1997; 5:251–261Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

12. Mayberg HS, Brannan SK, Mahurin RK, Jerabek PA, Brickman JS, Tekell JL, Martin CC, Lancaster JL, Fox PT: Cingulate function in depression: a potential predictor of treatment response. Neuroreport 1997; 8:1057–1061Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

13. Liotti M, Mayberg HS, McGinnis S, Brannan SL, Jerabek P: Unmasking disease-specific cerebral blood flow abnormalities: mood challenge in patients with remitted unipolar depression. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159:1830–1840LinkGoogle Scholar

14. Mayberg HS, Starkstein SE, Sadzot B, Preziosi T, Andrezejewski PL, Dannals RF, Wagner HN, Leigauarda R, Robinson RG: Selective hypometabolism in the inferior frontal lobe in depressed patients with Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 1990; 28:57–64Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

15. Mayberg HS, Starkstein SE, Peyser CE, Brandt J, Dannals RF, Folstein SE: Paralimbic frontal lobe hypometabolism in depression associated with Huntington’s disease. Neurology 1992; 42:1791–1797Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

16. Lesser IM, Mena I, Boone KB, Miller BL, Mehringer CM, Wohl M: Reduction of cerebral blood flow in older depressed patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994; 51:677–686Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

17. Awata S, Ito H, Konno M, Ono S, Kawashima R, Fukuda H, Sato M: Regional cerebral blood flow abnormalities in late-life depression: relation to refractoriness and chronification. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1998; 52:97–105Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

18. de Asis JM, Stern E, Alexopoulos GS, Pan H, Van Gorp W, Blumberg H, Kalayam B, Eidelberg D, Kiosses D, Silbersweig DA: Hippocampal and anterior cingulate activation deficits in patients with geriatric depression. Am J Psychiatry 2001; 158:1321–1323LinkGoogle Scholar

19. Kumar A, Thomas A, Lavretsky H, Yue K, Huda A, Curran J, Venkatraman T, Estanol L, Mintz J, Mega M, Toga A: Frontal white matter biochemical abnormalities in late-life major depression detected with proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159:630–636LinkGoogle Scholar

20. Alexopoulos GS, Kiosses DN, Choi SJ, Murphy CF, Lim KO: Frontal white matter microstructure and treatment response of late-life depression: a preliminary study. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159:1929–1932LinkGoogle Scholar

21. Harrison PJ: The neuropathology of primary mood disorder. Brain 2002; 125:1428–1449Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

22. Thomas AJ, O’Brien JT, Davis S, Ballard C, Barber R, Kalaria RN, Perry RH: Ischemic basis for deep white matter hyperintensities in major depression: a neuropathological study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2002; 59:785–792Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

23. Kumar A, Mintz J, Bilker W, Gottlieb G: Autonomous neurobiological pathways to late-life major depressive disorder: clinical and pathophysiological implications. Neuropsychopharmacology 2002; 26:229–236Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

24. Kumar A, Schweizer E, Jin Z, Miller D, Bilker W, Swan LL, Gottlieb G: Neuroanatomical substrates of late-life minor depression: a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study: Arch Neurol 1997; 54:613–617Google Scholar

25. Kumar A, Zin Z, Bilker W, Udupa J, Gottlieb G: Late onset minor and major depression: early evidence for common neuroanatomical substrates detected by using MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:7654–7658Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

26. Fuster JM: The prefrontal cortex—an update: time is of essence. Neuron 2001; 30:319–333Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

27. Hirayasu Y, Shenton ME, Salisbury DF, Kwon JS, Wible CG, Fischer IA, Yurgelun-Todd D, Zarate C, Kikinis R, Jolesz FA, McCarley RW: Subgenual cingulate cortex volume in first-episode psychosis. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156:1091–1093AbstractGoogle Scholar

28. Brambilla P, Nicoletti MA, Harenski K, Sassi RB, Mallinger AG, Frank E, Kupfer DJ, Keshavan MS, Soares JC: Anatomical MRI study of subgenual prefrontal cortex in bipolar and unipolar subjects. Neuropsychopharmacology 2002; 27:792–799Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

29. Bremner JD, Vythilingam M, Vermetten E, Nazeer A, Adil J, Khan S, Staib LH, Charney DS: Reduced volume of orbitofrontal cortex in major depression. Biol Psychiatry 2002; 51:273–279Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

30. Lai TJ, Payne ME, Byrum CE, Steffens DC, Krishnan KRR: Reduction of orbital frontal cortex volume in geriatric depression. Biol Psychiatry 2000; 48:971–975Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

31. Taylor WD, Steffens DC, McQuoid DR, Payne ME, Lee SH, Lai TJ, Krishnan KR: Smaller orbital frontal cortex volumes associated with functional disability in depressed elders. Biol Psychiatry 2003; 53:144–149Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

32. Rajkowska G, Miguel-Hidalgo JJ, Wei J, Dilley G, Pittman SD, Meltzer HY, Overholser JC, Roth BL, Stockmeier CA: Morphometric evidence for neuronal and glial prefrontal cell pathology in major depression. Biol Psychiatry 1999; 45:1085–1098Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

33. Rajkowska G: Postmortem studies in mood disorders indicate altered numbers of neurons and glial cells. Biol Psychiatry 2000; 48:766–777Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

34. Botteron KN, Raichle ME, Drevets WC, Heath AC, Todd RD: Volumetric reduction in left subgenual prefrontal cortex in early onset depression. Biol Psychiatry 2002; 51:342–344Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

35. Cotter D, Mackay D, Landau S, Kerwin R, Everall I: Reduced glial cell density and neuronal size in the anterior cingulate cortex in major depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001; 58:545–553Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

36. Hamilton M: Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 1967; 6:278–296Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

37. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: “Mini-Mental State”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12:189–198Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

38. Sled JP, Pike GB: Standing-wave and RF penetration of artifacts caused by elliptic geometry: an electrodynamic analysis of MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998; 17:653–662Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

39. Shattuck DW, Sandor-Leahy SR, Schaper KA, Rottenberg DA, Leahy RM: Magnetic resonance image tissue classification using a partial volume model. Neuroimage 2001; 13:856–876Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

40. Sowell ER, Thompson PM, Holmes CJ, Batth R, Jernigan TL, Toga AW: Localizing age-related changes in brain structure between childhood and adolescence using statistical parametric mapping. Neuroimage 1999; 9:587–598Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

41. Sowell ER, Thompson PM, Rex D, Kornsand D, Kessner KD, Jernigan TL, Toga AW: Mapping sulcal pattern asymmetry and local cortical surface gray matter distribution in vivo: maturation in perisylvian cortices. Cereb Cortex 2002; 12:17–26Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

42. MacDonald D, Avis D, Evans A: Multiple surface identification and matching in magnetic resonance images, in Proceedings of the International Society for Optical Engineering (SPIE) Conference on Visualization in Biomedical Computing. Edited by Robb RA. Rochester, Minn, SPIE, 1994, pp 160–169Google Scholar

43. Duvernoy H: The Human Brain: Surface, Three-Dimensional Sectional Anatomy and MRI. New York, Springer Verlag, 1991Google Scholar

44. Ono M, Kubik S, Abernathey CD: Atlas of the Cerebral Sulci. New York, Thieme Medical, 1990Google Scholar

45. Mathalon DH, Sullivan EV, Rawles JM, Pfefferbaum A: Correction for head-size in brain-imaging measurements. Psychiatry Res 1993; 50:121–139Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

46. Goldstein JM, Seidman LJ, Horton NJ, Makris N, Kennedy DN, Caviness VS Jr, Faraone SV, Tsuang MT: Normal sexual dimorphism of the adult human brain assessed by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Cereb Cortex 2001; 11:490–497Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

47. MacFall JR, Payne ME, Provenzale JE, Krishnan KRR: Medial orbital frontal lesions in late-onset depression. Biol Psychiatry 2001; 49:803–806Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

48. Öngür D, Price JL: The organization of networks within the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex of rats, monkeys and humans. Cereb Cortex 2000; 10:206–219Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

49. Öngür D, Drevets WC, Price JL: Glial reduction in the subgenual prefrontal cortex in mood disorders. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:13290–13295Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

50. Insausti R, Amaral DG, Cowan WM: The entorhinal cortex of the monkey, II: cortical afferents. J Comp Neurol 1987; 264:356–395Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

51. Suzuki WA, Amaral DG: Perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices of the macaque monkey: cortical afferents. J Comp Neurol 1994; 350:497–533Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

52. Amaral DG, Price JL: Amygdalo-cortical projections in the monkey. J Comp Neurol 1984; 230:465–496Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

53. Sapolsky RM, Pulsinelli WA: Glucocorticoids potentiate ischemic injury to neurons: therapeutic implications. Science 1985; 229:1397–1400Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

54. Duman RS, Charney DS: Cell atrophy and loss in major depression. Biol Psychiatry 1999; 45:1083–1084Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

55. Devinsky O, Morell MJ, Vogt BA: Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour. Brain 1995; 118:279–306Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

56. Morecraft RJ, Geula C, Mesulam MM: Cytoarchitecture and neural afferents of orbitofrontal cortex in the brain of the monkey. J Comp Neurol 1992; 15:341–358CrossrefGoogle Scholar

57. Andreasen NC, O’Leary DS, Cizadlo T, Arndt S, Rezai K, Watkins GL, Boles Ponto LL, Hichwa RD: Remembering the past: two facets of episodic memory explored with positron emission tomography. Am J Psychiatry 1995; 152:1576–1585LinkGoogle Scholar

58. Tisserand D, Pruessner JC, Sanz Arigita EJ, van Boxtel MP, Evans AC, Jolles J, Uylings HB: Regional and frontal cortical volumes decrease differentially in aging: an MRI study to compare volumetric approaches and voxel-based morphometry. Neuroimage 2002; 17:657–669Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

59. Salat DH, Kaye JA, Janowsky JS: Selective preservation and degeneration within the prefrontal cortex in aging and Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 58:1403–1408Google Scholar

60. Raz N, Gunning FM, Head D, Dupuis JH, McQuain J, Briggs SD, Loken WJ, Thornton AE, Acker JD: Selective aging of the human cerebral cortex in vivo: differential vulnerability of the prefrontal gray matter. Cereb Cortex 1997; 7:268–282Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

61. deGroot JC, de Leeuw FE, Oudkerk M, Hofman A, Jolles J, Breteler MM: Cerebral white matter lesions and depressive symptoms in elderly adults. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000; 57:1071–1076Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

62. Rademacher J, Galaburda AM, Kennedy DN, Filipek PA, Cainess VS: Human cerebral-cortex-localization, parcellation, and morphometry with magnetic-resonance-imaging. J Cogn Neurosci 1992; 4:352–374Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar